The Red Chamber's attendance woes have sparked a debate about the role and responsibilities of senators, with a focus on the balance between legislative duties and other commitments. In this article, we'll delve into the issue, exploring the implications and potential solutions.
The Absenteeism Problem
It's no secret that dozens of senators routinely miss key votes, with some legislative changes passing with barely half of the members present. This trend raises questions about the effectiveness and accountability of the Senate.
A Historical Perspective
While the issue of absenteeism is not new, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's reforms have seemingly exacerbated the problem. The removal of 'whips' and the shift towards independent senators have created a situation where attendance is largely voluntary. This has led to a perception of the Senate as a part-time position, with senators free from party pressure.
The Impact on Legislation
The low attendance rates have resulted in important bills, such as the middle-class tax cut and anti-hate crime legislation, passing with a mere 60 senators present. This raises concerns about the legitimacy and thoroughness of the legislative process.
Perspectives from Senators
Senators Gigi Osler and Lucie Moncion offer insights into the challenges. Osler emphasizes that a senator's responsibilities extend beyond the chamber, while Moncion highlights the need to balance parliamentary work with other duties. However, these explanations fail to address the core issue of absenteeism and its impact on the Senate's effectiveness.
The Appointment Process
Prime Minister Mark Carney's recent overhaul of the Senate appointments process aims to address these concerns. By signaling a desire for a more ambitious and focused Senate, Carney hopes to instill a sense of responsibility and accountability among senators.
The Cynicism Factor
Donald Savoie, a former member of the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments, highlights the cynicism that absenteeism fuels towards Canadian politics, especially among young people. He argues that the lack of accountability in the appointed Senate allows senators to act without consequence, further eroding public trust.
A Call for Action
With 76 sitting days in a year, Savoie believes senators should prioritize their chamber duties. The well-paid nature of the position, along with its benefits, should incentivize senators to show up and fulfill their legislative responsibilities. The growing disdain for institutions, as Savoie warns, is a real concern that must be addressed.
Conclusion
The absenteeism issue in the Red Chamber is a symptom of a larger problem: the lack of accountability and the perception of the Senate as a part-time job. While the appointment process and reforms aim to address these concerns, a cultural shift is needed to instill a sense of duty and responsibility among senators. Only then can the Senate truly fulfill its constitutional role and regain the trust of the Canadian public.
